Skip to main content

Stop the Access Tax: Redland City Council’s “User Pays” Scheme is an Outrageous Double Dip

Written by Bill Wight CIBA Secretary 

Redland City Council is determined to stay the course, pushing the burden of maintaining and replacing jetties on Moreton Bay Islands directly onto the residents. But let’s call this out for what it really is: double-dipping, plain and simple.

Stop the Access Tax


Since the Council introduced these landing fees, the operator has been crippled, raking in a staggering $1,000,000 in fees. That’s $247,000 from Coochiemudlo Island residents alone in 2024, with projections indicating an eye-watering increase to $320,000 per year. The Council argues that it wouldn’t be fair for mainland residents to subsidize island infrastructure, treating this as a straightforward “user pays” scenario. But here’s the kicker—they’ve got it all wrong.

As a former mayor who faced down a 3,000-strong petition over  a “user pays” argument, I’ve had more reason than most to consider how this principle should be applied. I believe in the “user pays” principle, but this? This is a gross misapplication. I was determined when I was right and got there in the end. This is so wrong, I'm every bit as determined to see the wrong righted.


Petition to the Local Government Minister


Breaking Down the “User Pays” Principle

The user pays principle should apply to ensure that the costs associated with providing a special benefit to a specific group of users should be paid for by that specific set of users.

Step 1: Costs Association

To begin with, any decent accounting system can identify the direct costs involved in providing a specific benefit. Maintenance costs, future replacement allowances—they’re all part of the equation. Here, Redland City Council gets a big tick.




Step 2: Specific Group of Users

Next, we identify the specific group of users who benefit. On the surface, this appears straightforward—people who live on the Moreton Bay Islands and visitors are the primary beneficiaries. Another big tick.


Step 3: Special Benefit

But here’s where the wheels fall off. The “user pays” principle hinges on providing a special benefit to a specific group of users. And this? This is not a special benefit. A jetty is nothing more than a bus terminal for boats. Everyone in Redland City has access to a bus terminal. Public transport infrastructure is not a privilege for the few; it’s a right for all. The jetty is a lifeline, a necessity—not some luxury add-on. A big cross.



The Access Tax: A Blatant Double Dip

This is where Redland City Council’s argument collapses. This isn’t a special benefit—it’s an essential service, akin to the roads and bus terminals that your rates already cover. By charging these landing fees, the Council is double dipping—hitting Moreton Bay Islands residents twice for the same service.

This is not just an access fee; it’s an access tax.

Why This Matters: A Call to Action

The implications of this double-dip are profound. It’s not just about the money—it’s about fairness, about holding our leaders accountable to the principles they claim to uphold. It’s about ensuring that no resident of Redland City is unfairly burdened simply because of where they live.

We cannot allow this to stand. If we don’t push back now, what’s next? Higher fees, more taxes, more injustices? This is not the Redland City we believe in, and it’s certainly not the Redland City we want to live in.



It’s time to take a stand. We need every resident—whether you live on the islands or the mainland—to raise your voice against this unfair tax. Join us in telling the Redland City Council that we will not tolerate this double-dipping. Together, we can stop the Access Tax.

Let’s make it clear: Access to transport is a right, not a privilege.

Follow our blog and stay informed.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Russell Jackson gets to expose the scandalous Redland City Council cash grab on Radio 4BC

 Published by Coochiemudlo Island Business Association CIBA President Russell Jackson had the opportunity to talk Gary Hardgrave on 4BC Drive with Gary Hardgrave. Gary was completely gobsmacked by the 1600% increase in landing fees levied by the Redland City Council which amounts the $500 per household on Coochiemudlo. It amounts to nothing more than a cash grab by RCC who didn't even pay for the jetty in the first place and will undoubtedly seek a government grant when it comes time to replace the jetties. Listen to the conversation. Please subscribe to updates and let's get this outrageous Access Tax stopped.

Bet you didn't know you are being exploited by an Access Tax

Written by Russell Jackson CIBA President 18 August 2024 Are You Aware You’re Being Exploited? Moreton Bay Island residents, it’s time to wake up and face the shocking reality: you are being exploited by the very council that is supposed to serve you. While your mainland neighbours go about their lives without any extra costs, you are being quietly squeezed for hundreds of dollars every year just to access your own home.  The Unfair Reality of the Access Tax Russell Jackson, president of the Coochiemudlo Island Business Association, has revealed a scandalous truth that has gone unnoticed by most residents: every household on Coochiemudlo Island is paying around $500 per year as an Access Tax—just for the right to return to their homes. This tax is on top of the council rates, which are already the highest in Southeast Queensland before this extra burden is added. And it’s not just Coochiemudlo Island; residents of the Southern Moreton Bay Islands like Russell and Macleay are also b...

Redland City’s Ferry Fee Folly: How Coochiemudlo Island Residents Are Paying Three Times More for Basic Access

Written by Bill Wight, Secretary CIBA Council’s Ferry Fees: An Unjust Burden on Coochiemudlo Island Residents In the peaceful enclave of Coochiemudlo Island, a community of about 850 residents, an unjust financial burden looms large. Every year, each household is hit with a $500 fee by the Redland City Council—more than three times the $150 paid by their neighbors in the Southern Moreton Bay Islands (SMBI). This staggering disparity in ferry landing fees is not just an economic strain; it’s a glaring example of council-imposed discrimination that threatens the fabric of this small, close-knit community. An Unfair Playing Field The Council’s defense of these fees hinges on the claim that they’ve created a “level playing field” by charging $9.50 per ferry touchdown, aimed at equally funding the island jetty terminals. However, when one group is forced to pay three times what others do, it’s clear this playing field is anything but level. For Coochiemudlo Island, this means paying signifi...